gh-94759: Collect C-level coverage using llvm-cov by mdboom · Pull Request #94760 · python/cpython · GitHub

github.com

Tin mới

mdboom:c-level-coverage

GitHub CopilotWrite better code with AI

GitHub Copilot appDirect agents from issue to merge

ActionsAutomate any workflow

CodespacesInstant dev environments

IssuesPlan and track work

Code ReviewManage code changes

Code QualityEnforce quality at merge

GitHub Advanced SecurityFind and fix vulnerabilities

Code securitySecure your code as you build

Secret protectionStop leaks before they start

View all use cases

Financial services

View all industries

Software Development

GitHub SponsorsFund open source developers

Copilot for BusinessEnterprise-grade AI features

Premium SupportEnterprise-grade 24/7 support

Pull requests 2.6k

Security and quality 0

organization-scoped token

Publish C-level coverage of the CPython test suite #94759

View reviewed changes

Learn more about hiding disruptive comments

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

faster-cpython/ideas#426

@tiran the idea of using clang comes from faster-cpython/ideas#426 where I believe branch coverage was considered the big win.

Update developer guide about C code coverage python/devguide#940

On macOS, Configure script assumes that "gcc" is an alias for "clang", even if it really is GCC #96249

Collect C-level coverage using llvm-cov

Refactor this as a Makefile target

Automatically select the coverage approach based on the compiler

Update configure.ac

Remove unnecessary quotes

Move more logic into configure

Cleanup after recent changes

python/steering-council#236

Create a new repository in the python organization for the results, e.g. cpython-c-coverage

Metabug: Improving C-level coverage #94808

github-actions Bot commented Apr 11, 2026

This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.