Antonio Cavallo
Fri Dec 14 01:10:45 CET 2012Previous message:
[Python-Dev] [Distutils] Is is worth disentangling distutils?
Next message:
[Python-Dev] [Distutils] Is is worth disentangling distutils?
Messages sorted by:
———
I'll have a look into distutils2, I tough it was (another) dead end. I every case my target is py2k (2.7.x) and I've no case for transitioning to py3k (too much risk). Lennart Regebro wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Antonio Cavallo > <
> wrote: >> Hi, >> I wonder if is it worth/if there is any interest in trying to "clean" up >> distutils: nothing in terms to add new features, just a *major* cleanup >> retaining the exact same interface. >>>>>> I'm not planning anything like *adding features* or rewriting rpm/rpmbuild >> here, simply cleaning up that un-holy code mess. Yes it served well, don't >> get me wrong, and I think it did work much better than anything it was meant >> to replace it. >>>> I'm not into the py3 at all so I wonder how possibly it could fit/collide >> into the big plan. >>>> Or I'll be wasting my time? >> The effort of making something that replaces distutils is, as far as I > can understand, currently on the level of taking the best bits out of > distutils2 and putting it into Python 3.4 under the name "packaging". > I'm sure that effort can need more help. >> //Lennart
———
Previous message:
[Python-Dev] [Distutils] Is is worth disentangling distutils?
Next message:
[Python-Dev] [Distutils] Is is worth disentangling distutils?
Messages sorted by:
———